NYT's David Sanger examines whether the Iran war could become a 'forever war' with no clear endgame
New York Times White House and national security correspondent David Sanger examines whether the ongoing war in Iran could develop into a prolonged conflict without a clear endgame, comparing it to the 'forever wars' that President Trump campaigned against.
Why we included this story▾▴
Learn about our confidence system → · What qualifies a story →
Stay with this story
Response links are not endorsements. They are restrained ways to learn more, track updates, and ask better questions.
Share responsibly
Share the story with context, not outrage. Include what is known and what remains unclear.
Eligibility: Geopolitical conflict is limited to learning, tracking, and careful sharing. View taxonomy →
Did this feel useful, agenda-driven, or unclear?
Get stories like this every morning.
Free daily briefing, 5 minutes, no spin.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.